Compare
Honest comparisons, sourced and dated.
Postmortem is our product, so we hold these to a higher bar: every competitor claim is sourced from their own public pages, every price is dated, and we say plainly where the other tool is the better pick. Here’s how Postmortem stacks up against the crypto futures journals people actually compare it to.
Head to head
Postmortem vs Coin Market Manager
The established name at ~$50/mo vs the crypto-futures specialist at ~$7 — priced, sourced and honest about who should pick which.
Read the comparison →Roundup
Best crypto futures trading journals
Seven journals ranked by crypto-futures depth, auto-sync coverage, psychology features and price — with an “as of” date on every number.
Read the comparison →Roundup
Coin Market Manager alternatives
CMM is ~$50/mo with no free plan. Five cheaper and freemium journals, each with honest pros, cons and who it’s for.
Read the comparison →Head to head
Postmortem vs TraderSync
The multi-asset journal built for brokers vs the crypto-futures specialist — who each one is actually for.
Read the comparison →Head to head
Postmortem vs Tradervue
The long-running equities journal vs the crypto-futures specialist — where each one earns its subscription.
Read the comparison →Head to head
Postmortem vs TradesViz
The analytics powerhouse vs the crypto-futures specialist — more charts, or a named answer.
Read the comparison →How we compare things
Vendor-written comparisons are usually worthless, and you should assume ours is too until it earns otherwise. So here are the rules we hold these pages to — check any page against them, and tell us if one slips.
Every competitor claim is sourced to their own pages
Prices, exchange support and feature lists come from the vendor’s public pricing and docs, linked at the foot of each comparison so you can check them yourself. We don’t cite reviews, roundups or our own recollection.
Every page is dated, and re-verified quarterly
Pricing pages change quietly. Each comparison carries a visible “last updated” date and the date its competitor facts were verified, so you can tell at a glance whether you’re reading something stale.
We say where the other tool wins
Every head-to-head names the cases where you should pick the competitor instead — Hyperliquid support and public verified track records, for example, are things Postmortem doesn’t do. A comparison that never reaches that conclusion isn’t a comparison.
The affiliation is stated on every page
Postmortem is our product. That disclosure sits under the headline of each comparison, not in a footer. We also don’t run affiliate links to the tools we compare against, so nothing here is ranked by what pays.
What to compare on
If you’re evaluating crypto futures journals generally — with or without us on the list — these are the five things that actually decide whether you’re still using the tool in three months. Everything else is a feature-grid tiebreaker.
01
Does it sync your exchange, or do you type?
Manual journals die in about two weeks, and they die selectively — the trades you skip are the ones that would have taught you something. Read-only API sync is the single feature most correlated with a journal you’re still filling in next quarter.
02
Does it understand futures, or just portfolios?
Leverage, funding, liquidation distance and R-multiples need to be first-class. A spot portfolio tracker with a notes field will tell you what you made, never why, and never what your risk actually was.
03
Does it tell you anything you didn’t already know?
Win rate and P&L are arithmetic — you have those already. The question is whether the tool identifies the recurring mistake behind your losing clusters, or just draws a nicer equity curve on top of the same data.
04
What does it cost against your account size?
A $50/month journal on a $2,000 account is a 30% annual drag before you place a trade. Judge the price against your capital, not against the feature list, and check whether there’s a free tier you can survive on while the account is small.
05
How hard is it to get your data back out?
CSV export, and whether the API keys are read-only. You should be able to leave with your trade history intact, and no journal should ever hold a key that can trade or withdraw.